Narbesky v. Narbesky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This case arises on a husband’s petition asking that his obligation to support his wife be terminated. The lower court granted the petition on the basis that the wife’s “friendship” with another man constituted “indignities.” This was error.
It is well established that the obligation of support terminates when it is shown that the conduct of the financially dependent spouse provides a ground for divorce. Commonwealth ex rel. Young v. Young, 213 Pa.Super. 515, 247 A.2d 659 (1968), allocatur refused; Commonwealth ex rel. Brobst v. Brobst, 173 Pa.Super. 171, 96 A.2d 194 (1953);…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McKrell v. McKrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Wick v. WickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Steinke v. SteinkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Lowe v. LoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Phipps v. PhippsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keller v. KellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GoodyearSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- S.M.C. v. W.P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012