Legal Opinion

People v. Ebner

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Sixteenth Judicial District, Amador County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action upon a forfeited recognizance, executed by the defendants as sureties for one A. Heilbron, for his appearance to answer to an indictment for the crime of false imprisonment. On the trial the plaintiff introduced in evidence the record of the Court of Sessions of Amador County, in which the indictment was pend-*160mg, relating to the default of the party charged with the offense, which showed that when the case was called the defendant Heilbron appeared by attorney, though not in person, and tendered to the Court a plea of not guilty to the indictment; but the Court refused to…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. AymarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. In Re BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Beasley v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API