Western & Southern Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
This case involves the constitutionality of two provisions of California law imposing taxes on foreign insurance companies. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff insurance company, holding that one of those provisions (the so-called retaliatory tax) was unconstitutional. It also made findings on other issues as set forth in its memorandum of intended decision as follows:
“In the above-entitled matter now submitted, judgment is for plaintiff for the full amount of tax refunds sought in accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Decision plus interest.
“To dispose of all…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Franklin Life Insurance v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981