Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Parker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1938No. 33,899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for fraud in obtaining a conveyance of mineral rights in certain described real estate. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, and he appeals, assigning as error the ruling on the demurrer as well as rulings excluding certain evidence and denying a motion for a new trial.

We shall first notice the objections of the appellee to our consideration of the appeal. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. (See Hicks v. Parker, 143 Kan. 763, 57 P. 2d 413, for a full…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Kotwitz v. Gridley Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. PulliamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Topinka v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Dwinnell v. Acacia Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Kotwitz v. Gridley Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API