Legal Opinion

Conaway v. Life Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1947No. 31048PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

This case fortunately involves no controversy as to either the law or the operative facts. Bather, the task is that of applying undisputed law to undisputed facts.

The entire difficulty arises from the following language employed by the defendant insurance company in an endorsement attached to the policy:

“On account of the aviation hazard of the insured,, this policy is issued with the following amendment:
“Death as a result directly or indirectly of service,, travel or flight in or on any species of aircraft, except as a farepaying passenger in a licensed plane-operating on a regular schedule…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Trahan v. Southland Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Burns v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1948
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  5. McKanna v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API