Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Nelson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 13, 1963No. Civ. 8565PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacBRIDE, District Judge.

This is an action for judicial review of an administrative order of the Bureau of Land Management denying petitioner’s application under 43 U.S.C. § 1068 for a patent to a tract of land containing 2.29 acres. The ground on which the Bureau based its denial was that the land was not held by petitioner and his predecessors under claim or color of title as required by § 1068. The order was affirmed on appeal by the Secretary of the Interior. This Court has heretofore issued an injunction restraining respondents from clouding petitioner’s title to such land pending…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Switchmen's Union v. National Mediation BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Homovich v. Chapman, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Twin Cities Chippewa Tribal Council v. Minnesota Chippewa TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Hi-Ridge Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Campaign Clean Water, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Sugarman v. ForbragdDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1967
  5. Hall v. HickelDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API