United States v. Smith
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge
Defendant Billy Ray Smith has filed pro se two motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate.the sentence imposed upon him for his supervised release violation, alleging that he is actually innocent and that the court lacked jurisdiction to impose that sentence. The government opposes Smith’s motions, arguing that Smith’s claims are procedurally defaulted because he failed to raise them on direct appeal. Because Smith did not file a direct appeal of his sentence and has not demonstrated cause and actual prejudice to overcome procedural default, nor…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MahdiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. Deft. 1District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- United States v. KelseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- United States v. RedrickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- United States v. ZagorskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016