Legal Opinion

Baird v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2017No. SD 34427PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARYW. SHEFFIELD, C.J.—

OPINION AUTHOR

Daniel Ray Baird (“Movant”) appeals from the dismissal of his untimely pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.1 In his sole point he claims his motion should be deemed timely under the “mailbox rule.” We reject this claim and affirm the motion court’s dismissal.

Factual and Procedural Background

Movant plead guilty to one count of second-degree robbery, one count of second-degree murder, and one count of armed criminal action. He was delivered to the Department of Corrections to begin serving his thirty-five year sentence on October 25, 2013.

On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. McFadden v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. O'ROURKE v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Spells v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. El-Vester Robinson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Galbreath v. GriffithDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API