Baird v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARYW. SHEFFIELD, C.J.—
OPINION AUTHOR
Daniel Ray Baird (“Movant”) appeals from the dismissal of his untimely pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.1 In his sole point he claims his motion should be deemed timely under the “mailbox rule.” We reject this claim and affirm the motion court’s dismissal.
Factual and Procedural Background
Movant plead guilty to one count of second-degree robbery, one count of second-degree murder, and one count of armed criminal action. He was delivered to the Department of Corrections to begin serving his thirty-five year sentence on October 25, 2013.
On…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- McFadden v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- O'ROURKE v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Spells v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- El-Vester Robinson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Galbreath v. GriffithDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019