Legal Opinion

McFadden v. State

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 2008No. SC 88895PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Mr. McFadden appeals the dismissal of his Rule 29.15 motion, claiming that his motion should be re-opened and considered on the merits because he timely prepared it and sent it to his counsel, at her direction, and she then abandoned him and failed to file it within the 90-day time period provided in Rule 29.15(b). After opinion by the court of appeals, this Court granted transfer. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. 10. This Court holds that counsel’s actions constituted abandonment, and the judgment below is reversed.

Factual and Procedural Background

Mr. Vincent McFadden was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. Gehrke v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  4. Walter Barton v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. Crenshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API