Legal Opinion

Hennepin County v. Geshick

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 1986No. C4-86-113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from two orders regarding child support and AFDC reimbursement in a paternity action. The trial court awarded judgment for arrearages owed by the father, but awarded current support based on AFDC expended for the child, rather than on the statutory guidelines. We affirm the judgment for arrear-ages, and reverse and remand the support award.

FACTS

Hennepin County brought this action in November, 1983, to adjudicate paternity and establish child support. Respondent Raymond Geshick had by affidavit ac knowledged paternity. The child’s mother was receiving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. County of Anoka v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. County of Isanti v. FormhalsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. County of Nicollet v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. County of Ramsey v. ShirCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Schaefer v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Marriage of Otto v. OttoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API