Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided January 3, 1947No. File 67294Published

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment. All of the parties are nonresidents. Service on the defendants was had by registered mail. They appeared specially and filed a plea in abatement, whioh was overruled. Thereupon they entered a general appearance and answered, but reserved, however, their rights to contest the jurisdiction of this court. Coyne v. Plume, 90 Conn. 293, 297.

The litigation springs from two matrimonial ventures of the defendant, Leslie. He married the plaintiff, Louise, during 1931 at New York, where each of them was domiciled and where, after their marriage, they…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Santoro v. KleinbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Murdock v. MurdockConnecticut Superior Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API