Legal Opinion
Anderson v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REV.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 12, 1989No. 2510 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Walter Anderson 1 (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied his claim for benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. 2 We affirm.
OK Grocery Company (Employer) employed Claimant as a warehouseman. Employer had a progressive disciplinary policy where an employee could be terminated for an accumulation of chargeable absences. Claimant had accumulated a number of chargeable absences that resulted in warnings and a suspension.
On or about March 1, 1988, Claimant was arrested as a result of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schneider v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Wysocki v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hawkins v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Masko v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bruce v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Fennell v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Pennsylvania Power Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Bruce v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- S.E. Fee v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.