Legal Opinion
Brockport National Bank v. Webaco Oil Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.
The complaint sets forth that the plaintiff is the holder of a mortgage in which it has not any interest at the present time and which mortgage is claimed by both defendants. The complaint and the exhibits attached thereto state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action of interpleader.
*70The appellant claims that an interpleader action may be maintained only against two or more persons who claim the whole or any part of a sum of money payable by plaintiff under a contract, as provided in section 285 of the Civil Practice Act, and that sections 285 and 287 of the Civil Practice Act…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Pouch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Dorn v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Hess v. W. & J. SloaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Monetary GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- Lowin v. Dayton Securities Associates (In Re the Securities Group 1980)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
- Approved Factors v. Imperial Bolt & Screw Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1958
- Rodkind v. Khosrovshahi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952