Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramos
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 28, 2006No. 98 CR. 1038(SWK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
Defendant Mario Ramos (“Ramos”) moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he has been denied a speedy trial, in violation of the Sixth Amendment and- the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174. In brief, Ramos argues that “during the period from the filing of the indictment in this case (September 1998) until his arrest (March 2004), the Government did not arrest or seek to prosecute him in this case.” (Def.’s Mem. Supp. Mot. Dismiss 2.) In opposition to the defendant’s motion, the Government argues that Ramos was a fugitive during the disputed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Derrick ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Griselda BlancoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James Ray Shell, A/K/A Kelly Barrick Bonney, A/K/A Chris Raymond WeberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dearstyne v. MazzucaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. MorenoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016