Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Coughlin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1996No. 8911-06395; CA A87937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiff and defendant were agents for Mutual of New York (MONY). They formed a partnership to sell life insurance, primarily with MONY but also with other companies. Plaintiff seeks an accounting of the partnership’s business and a division of commissions earned in the course of the partnership. On remand from our previous decision, Thompson v. Coughlin, 124 Or App 398, 862 P2d 582 (1993), rev den 318 Or 351 (1994), the trial court refused to render an accounting on the ground that plaintiff had unclean hands and was not entitled to equitable relief. Plaintiff appeals. We review de novo and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Taylor v. GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Gratreak v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CoughlinOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Beldt v. LeiseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API