Legal Opinion
Heimbach v. State
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1983PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking a declaratory judgment that (1) “the roll call vote taken upon proposition designated as A9050 * * * was not correctly registered by the Clerk of the Senate”; and (2) that chapter 485 of the Laws of 1981 (Tax Law, § 1109) is violative of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Section 40 of the Legislative Law provides that the presiding officer’s certificate showing the date and requisite votes for passage of a bill shall be “conclusive…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. SteingutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Anderson v. KrupsakNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by24 opinions
- King v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. KeppleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Heimbach v. ChuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. MarinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Urban Justice Center v. PatakiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.