Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Estate of Davis

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1994No. 18442Published

1Dissent

HENDERSON, Retired Justice

(dissenting).

It is a long-standing rule of law that the trier of fact, in its capacity as sole judge of the credibility of witnesses, may accept or reject all or part of an expert’s testimony. Lewton v. McCauley, 460 N.W.2d 728 (S.D.1990); Cargill Inc. v. Elliott Farms, Inc., 363 N.W.2d 212 (S.D.1985); State v. Romero, 269 N.W.2d 791 (S.D.1978). Expert Deming Smith testified that the assets were capable of being valued at the time of Ethlyn Davis’ death. He fixed the amount at $62,255.00. Another expert David Gerdes testified the lawsuit was not capable of evaluation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cody v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lewton v. McCauleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Inheritance Tax Division v. Estate of CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API