Girard v. St. Louis Car-Wheel Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action is brought by an employe against his employer to recover damages for a personal inj ury on the theory of negligence. There was a trial before a jury, and a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500. The defendant appeals to this court, and assigns errors in such a way as requires us to set out the pleadings. The peti-' tion was as follows:
“The plaintiff states that the defendant is, and at the times hereafter mentioned was, a corporation by virtue of the law of Missouri, and owned and operated the foundry, building and appliances herein described ; that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Blair v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Schultz v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blinder v. MonaghanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Alexander v. Grand Avenue Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893
- Citizens' Street Railroad v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Kingman-Moore Implement Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Malkmus v. St. Louis Portland Cement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.