Legal Opinion

Girard v. St. Louis Car-Wheel Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1891PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This action is brought by an employe against his employer to recover damages for a personal inj ury on the theory of negligence. There was a trial before a jury, and a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500. The defendant appeals to this court, and assigns errors in such a way as requires us to set out the pleadings. The peti-' tion was as follows:

“The plaintiff states that the defendant is, and at the times hereafter mentioned was, a corporation by virtue of the law of Missouri, and owned and operated the foundry, building and appliances herein described ; that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Blair v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Schultz v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blinder v. MonaghanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  2. Alexander v. Grand Avenue Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Citizens' Street Railroad v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Kingman-Moore Implement Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Malkmus v. St. Louis Portland Cement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API