Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Hooge

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 6, 1963No. 14058PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by James Norman Matlock against L. A. Hooge, d/b/a L. A. Hooge Co., and Charles L. Pattillo, seeking to recover damages for personal injury sustained in an automobile accident near Edin-burg, Texas. The automobile was owned by Hooge Company and was being driven by Pattillo at the time of the collision. Mat-lock, his twelve-year-old nephew, and one Ramirez were passengers in the Volkswagen automobile which Pattillo was driving, and when he fell asleep the Volkswagen struck a palm tree and caused the injuries complained of by Matlock. The trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burt v. LochausenTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Napier v. MooneyhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  4. Wood v. OrtsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nehring v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Dietrich v. FR Young CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Berentsen v. BellinghausenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Sullivan v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Jones v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API