Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

From a judgment dismissing the action on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the defendant appealed.

The complaint was as follows:

"1. That the city of Asheville is a body politic and corporate, duly chartered and organized under and by virtue of an act of the General Assembly of North Carolina, entitled `An Act to amend the charter of the town of Asheville,' ratified 8 March, A. D., 1883, and the acts of which that act is amendatory and the acts amending the same.
"2. That on 4 March, A. D., 1888, the plaintiff was the owner of a certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Sondley v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Spence Ross v. . TapscottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API