Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
From a judgment dismissing the action on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the defendant appealed.
The complaint was as follows:
"1. That the city of Asheville is a body politic and corporate, duly chartered and organized under and by virtue of an act of the General Assembly of North Carolina, entitled `An Act to amend the charter of the town of Asheville,' ratified 8 March, A. D., 1883, and the acts of which that act is amendatory and the acts amending the same.
"2. That on 4 March, A. D., 1888, the plaintiff was the owner of a certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Walker v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Sondley v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- State v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Spence Ross v. . TapscottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975