Legal Opinion

State v. Suber

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 23, 1909No. 7106PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Gage, J., Laurens, January term, 1908. Indictment against Richard Súber for murder of Dave Hunter. From sentence on verdict of manslaughter, defendant appeals. cite: It is error to contradict a witness on an irrelevant issue: 30 Ency.; 1100, HO®; 33 S. C., 139, 35S; 43 S. C., 310 ;1 McC., 333; 49 Am. R., 794. Oral argument.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

On the night of 38th December, 1907, a number of persons were standing around the railroad station and store of W. H. Whitlock at Goldville in Laurens county. Several shots were fired and one Dave Hunter was killed. The defendant, Richard Súber, was indicted on the charge of the murder of Hunter and convicted of manslaughter.

1 The main reliance of defendant’s counsel in asking for a reversal of the judgment is the alleged error of the Circuit Judge in allowing the solicitor to ask Ed Ham, a witness for the defendant, if he had not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WyseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  2. State v. BodieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  2. State v. CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API