Legal Opinion
Bullock v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0985PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daryl L. Bullock (“Bullock”) brings this action against defendants Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) and WMATA police officer M.E. McKinney (“Officer McKinney”), arising from an alleged physical altercation between Bullock and McKinney. In the complaint, Bullock asserts claims of false arrest and negligent training and supervision against WMATA, Compl. [Dkt. # 1] ¶¶ 31-33, 38-40, and of false arrest and use of excessive force against Officer McKinney, id. ¶¶ 31-37. The false arrest and use of excessive force…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jones v. PanettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Martin v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Cole v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Dimondstein v. StidmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Farmer v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.