Legal Opinion

Ricky Mills v. Bill Armontrout and William Webster

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1991No. 90-1788PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Ricky Mills appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Mills makes three arguments on appeal. First, he claims that he was denied his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection when the district court declined to make independent findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented in his post-conviction action. The district court adopted the state appellate court’s findings that Mills’ trial counsel had no conflict of interest. Factual determinations made by the state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. CalmeseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Lawrence K. Comer v. Robert F. Parratt, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. LivelyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  2. Alexander Garrett v. Dave DormireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Becker v. LuebbersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Craig L. Patterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Paul Anderson v. Michael BowersoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API