Legal Opinion

Mancourt v. Wissel

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1925No. 12,041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellees Wissel and Christ-man against appellant and appellee Powl, for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.

Appellees Wissel and Christman charge that they made certain repairs on a heating plant, which was located on real estate belonging to appellant, and that such repairs were ordered by appellee Powl, under a lease between appellant and appellee Powl, whereby appellee Powl agreed, at her own expense, to make necessary repairs on the leased property, including the heating plant, expending therefor not less than $1,800. The suit was originally brought against both appellant and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Laird v. MoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Ward v. NoldeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Carey-Lombard Lumber Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Holland v. FarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Rader v. A. J. Barrett Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Islam Society, Inc. v. Bob Ulrich Decorating Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Mulcahy Lumber Co. v. OhlandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Granite Improvement Co. v. O'HaverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Merithew v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API