Laidlaw v. Pacific Bank
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; Frank J. Murasky, Judge. Action by Charles E. Laidlaw against the Pacific Bank. Mathew McGowan intervened. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appeal from judgment on the judgment-roll. The findings show that the appellant was incorporated under the name of “Pacific Accumulation Loan Company” under an act of April 11, 1862, entitled “An act to provide for the formation of corporations for the accumulation and investment of funds and savings” (Stats. 1862, p. 199), and that subsequently, by authority of an act of the legislature, it changed its name to that of “Pacific Bank.” That at all times it had a capital stock of $1,000,000, divided into ten thousand shares of the par value of $100 each, all of which was subscribed…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aldrich v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Ward v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Union Water Co. v. Murphy's Flat Fluming Co.California Supreme Court · 1863
- Main v. CasserlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.