Legal Opinion

Bochetto v. Gibson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 2004No. 47 EAP 2003PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Justice NIGRO.

At issue in this appeal is whether an attorney is absolutely immune from liability on the basis of the judicial privilege when he faxes to a reporter a complaint that he has previously filed. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the judicial privilege does not protect an attorney from liability for such conduct.

In April 1997, Pickering Hunt (“Pickering”), a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation,1 hired Appellant George Bochetto, Esquire, an employee, officer, and shareholder of the law firm of Bochetto & Lentz, P.C., to defend it in two lawsuits concern*248ing.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Binder v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. American Future Systems, Inc. v. Better Business BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Schanne, R., Aplt. v. Addis, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Karoly v. MancusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Wilson v. MarrowCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Freundlich & Litman, LLC v. Feierstein, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API