Crouse v. . Frothingham
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made May 2, 1882, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. (Reported below, 27 Hun, 128.) The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made May 2, 1882, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. (Reported below, 27 Hun, 128.) The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion. Declarations made by the grantor of premises, after he has sold the same, even though he continue in the occupation of them to the time of making such declarations, are not competent evidence as affecting the rights of the grantee. .(Vrooman v.…
1Opinion of the CourtDanforth, J.
The plaintiffs, as judgment and execution creditors of one Bandolph, sought by this action to have certain premises now owned by Laura Frothingham charged with the payment of their debt, upon the grounds, first, that they were conveyed to her by Bandolph with intent to hinder and delay them in its collection ; second, that notwithstanding the conveyance the debtor had still a valuable interest in the property. The first is not sustained either by the finding of the trial judge or the evidence, but judgment has been rendered in favor of the plaintiffs upon the other ground. We think it cannot…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bate v. . GrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Dewey v. . MoyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Spring v. . ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Fort Stanwix Bank v. . LeggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Emigrant Industrial Sav'gs B'k v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by20 opinions
- Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Marcraft Recreation Corp. v. Francis Devlin Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Spelman v. . FreedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Wagner v. CoenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Campbell v. HeilandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.