Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Reese ex rel. Reese v. Proctor

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1971No. 12372Published

1ConcurrenceCrockett, Justice

(concurring specially) :

I concur in affirming the judgment. In-' asmuch as the question relating to the submission of the case to the jury on the theory of “last clear chance” involves some difficulty and some disagreement, as indicated by the dissent, I desire to set forth my reasons for approval of doing so.

The foundational premise from which such an analysis must proceed is that one who is himself guilty of negligence which proximately causes his own injury ordinarily cannot recover from someone else for causing that injury, even though the latter may be. guilty of negligence which also…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morby v. RogersUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Compton v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Anderson v. Bingham & Garfield Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hughes v. HooperUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Pollari v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API