Legal Opinion
Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1931No. 28,263PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendants appeal from judgment rendered in an action to recover for the death of Elmer Weber caused by the alleged negligence of defendants. After the verdict each defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. There was no motion for a new trial.
The defendant packing corporation owns and operates an extensive canning plant at St. Cloud, Minnesota. At the peak of the canning- season it employs up to 400 persons and operates both day' and night. Tin cans are used in carload lots. A street running north and south formerly separated the pea canning plant on the west from that for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Hoppe v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Scott v. Independent School District No. 709Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. SnugginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Schroepfer v. City of Sleepy EyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.