Pateley Associates I, LLC v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO' DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendant Pitney Bowes, Inc. (“PBI”) has moved to dismiss the nine-count Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Pateley Associates LP (“Pateley LP” or the “LP”) and Pateley Associates I, LLC (“Pateley LLC” or the “LLC”), and Plaintiffs have moved for summary judgment on their claim of breach of contract alleging PBI’s failure to defend them in a lawsuit brought against them by the Innis Arden Golf Club (“IAGC”). For the reasons that follow, PBI’s motion to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Culwick v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Cathay Bank v. MalliarakisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Conservation Law Foundation, Inc. v. Shell Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022