Legal Opinion

United Railroads of San Francisco v. City and County of San Francisco

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 21, 1919No. 282PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion..

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill in equity brought by the appellant to prevent the construction of a municipal street railway on Market street and adjoining streets in San .Francisco with tracks on the. two sides of the plaintiff’s double track, for more than five blocks, and also to prevent the inci dental cutting of the plaintiff’s tracks. The appellant claims the right by grant' and contract to forbid the proposed action and relies upon the Constitution of the United States, upon the state constitution which provides that private property shall not be taken or damaged for public use without just…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Madera Water Works v. MaderaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co. v. Wheeling Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Williams v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Hladek v. City of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Indiana State Fair Board v. Hockey Corp. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Market Street Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API