Legal Opinion

Burstein v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 14, 1980No. 402-76PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

This case is before us on defendant’s requested review of the report of Trial Judge David Schwartz, which found that the plaintiffs are entitled to an exclusion under I.R.C. § 1171 for fellowship amounts received while in medical *4residency programs during 1973. For reasons which will be discussed below, after consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we reject the recommended decision and hold for defendant.

The plaintiffs, Dr. Rochelle Burstein (Rochelle) and Dr. Jerome Burstein (Jerome), were medical residents in pediatrics and radiology, respectively, at the University of New Mexico.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Bingler v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Helvering v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. Reese v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Xerox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Melvin A. Yarlott, Jr. And Rebecca L. Yarlott v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Yarlott v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Mizell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API