Bramble v. Kleindienst
District Court, D. Colorado
1Per curiam
In his complaint plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the statutory scheme here involved 1 which authorizes summary seizure of property used in violation of the law and under which his automobile was seized, is unconstitutional on its face. He further seeks injunctive relief. The sole issue which the plaintiff argued at the trial was the constitutionality of the statute on its face.
On the motion of plaintiff, a three-judge court was convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284. A hearing has been held, and the three-judge panel is of the opinion that the federal question here posed as a basis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. A. E. Edwards, T/a Apex Amusement Company, Claimant-Intervenor of Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices and $257.20 in CoinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. One 1956 Ford Fairlane Tudor Sedan, Motor No. M6et100140Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Conway v. StannardSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- United States v. Eight Bales S I.J.K. 1/8 Strapped SealedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bramble v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Bramble v. KleindienstDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1973
- Bramble v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Doles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Porter v. GrafTech International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024