Legal Opinion
Langbord v. United States Department of the Treasury
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 28, 2009No. Civil Action 06-CV-05315PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This litigation arises out of a dispute between Plaintiffs and the United States Government over ten 1933 Double Eagle $20 gold coins. In August 2004, Plaintiffs Roy, Joan, and David Langbord, acting through their counsel Barry Berke (“Berke”), contacted the Chief Counsel for the United States Mint, Daniel Shaver (“Shaver”), and the Senior Legal Counsel for the United States Mint, Greg Weinman (“Weinman”), to inform them that they had discovered the Double Eagles in a family safety deposit box in…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Chaim v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- In re Funds on DepositDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Langbord v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016