Legal Opinion
United States v. Lacrelle Clay
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 29, 2014No. 13-3510PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
LaCrelle Clay challenges his 24-month term of reimprisonment for violating his conditions of supervised release. Clay argues that the district court abused its discretion by relying on a factor from the sentencing statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A) — “the need for the sentence imposed ... to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense” — -that is not listed in the statute governing post-revocation sentencing, 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). We now join the majority of circuits that have addressed the question…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Austin Webb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Jawad MiqbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Juan SalinasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Charles ArmourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Esteras v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- United States v. Brian FordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Danial MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Joseph WilcherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.