Legal Opinion
United States v. Maxwell
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 21, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-1017-A, No. CR. 99-329-APublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CACHERIS, District Judge.
The primary issue presented in this case is a novel one: whether the Government, having (1) included a forfeiture count in the defendant’s indictment; (2) been notified in general terms of the conveyance of the defendant’s real property prior to sentencing; (3) already received a ruling regarding the defendant’s ability to pay a fine; and (4) failed to formally attack the validity of the conveyance at the defendant’s sentencing hearing, is now prevented from challenging the conveyance as fraudulent in a subsequent civil proceeding. For the reasons…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Debra Rogers v. Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lee L. Saad Constr. Co. v. DPF Architects, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ResnickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- United States v. First Choice Armor & Equipment, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bond v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Old Town Food Service, LLC v. GoldDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.