Legal Opinion

Peters v. Fogarty

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In tort. On rule to skow cause why a new trial should not be granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

An action of tort for false imprisonment, brought in this court by John B. Peters against The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and John D. *387Fogarty, was tried in the Ocean Circuit, and there, the innocence of the corporate defendant being conceded, the evidence was submitted to the jury on the issue between the plaintiff and Fogarty.- The jury returned a verdict which was understood by the presiding justice to be in favor of Fogarty, and was so entered, and subsequently he signed a postea to that effect. Within an hour after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Jackson ex dem. Noah v. Dickenson & ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1818

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Caylat v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Wolfgram v. Town of SchoepkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Palestroni v. JacobsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API