Legal Opinion

Carraway v. Stancill.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ActioN by George W. Carraway and others against G. A. Stancill and others, heard by Judge W. B. Council, at November Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Pitt County, upon motion by plaintiffs for judgment by default against certain defendants. From a refusal to grant the motion, the plaintiffs appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiffs moved the Court in writing for judgment under section 390 of The Code “for the failure of the defendants to file a bond required by law for defendants in action to recover land; as against G. A. Staneill for recovery "of the land described in the complaint, without damages; and as against .all of the defendants, except G. A. Staneill, for judgment by default final for the debt set out in the complaint, and for foreclosure of the mortgage set out in the complaint, upon the ground that the defendants, other than G. A. Staneill, have been duly made parties and served with process,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Asheville Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Hall v. Hall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Tennessee River Land & Timber Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Curran v. . KerchnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. WilkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Motley v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Martin v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Whitlock v. Auburn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API