Legal Opinion · Dissent
Stewart v. Smith
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 23, 1926No. 12106Published
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : The respondent states the case in part as follows:
“This action was begun on May 11, 1925, by the service of the summons and complaint, for damages on the alleged breach of an implied warranty. The appellant sold to respondent an automatic electrical piano in June, 1920, for which respondent agreed to pay $1,750.00, and executed a title-retention agreement securing her notes which she gave in payment of the purchase price.”
For the purposes of this appeal the construction placed upon the complaint by the counsel for the plaintiff, as an action for damages on account of the breach…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Merchants & Planters Bank v. BrigmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Bunday v. Columbus Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Ebner v. Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Rainwater v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.