Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1951No. 6204_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Court of the United States sustaining the disallowance by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of certain alleged “trade discounts” claimed by Thomas B. Lilly and Helen W. Lilly (hereinafter referred to as taxpayers), trading as the City Optical Company of Wilmington, North Carolina, totaling $61,601.95 and $60,021.65 for the years 1943 and 1944 respectively, and against Helen W. Lilly, trading as the Duke Optical Company, in the amounts of $6,-568.87 and $4,798.35 for the years 1943 and 1944 respectively.

The facts are not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lilly v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
  3. Wright v. JeckleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Wright v. JeckleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Weather-Seal Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API