Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Carlin

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2008No. Civil Action 07-288(RCL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss [7] plaintiffs amended complaint [6] for want of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. The Court has considered the parties’ filings, the applicable law, and the entire record herein. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will abstain from exercising jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims at present and will stay this litigation pending final adjudication of plaintiffs application for admission to the District of Columbia Bar.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Frank…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farva Jafri v. New Hampshire Supreme Court Committee on Character and Fitness, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
  2. Eisenberg v. West Virginia Office of Disciplinary CounselDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  3. Jafri v. NH Supreme Court Committee on Character and FitnessDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
  4. Jafri v. NH Supreme Court Committee on Character and FitnessDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
  5. Lawrence v. CarlinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API