Legal Opinion
Peterson v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 26, 1940No. 11713PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether the district court erred under the circumstances in denying to the appellant, a farmer-debtor, the benefits of the FrazierLemke Act, section 75, sub. s of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203 sub. s.
The appellant owns and with her husband resides on a farm of 120.acres situated in Montgomery county, Iowa, on which the appellee holds a mortgage. On February 27, 1939, appellant filed her petition under section 75, subs, a to r. The court approved the petition and referred the matter to the Conciliation Commissioner. Prior to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carpenter v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di NavigazioneSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Stetson v. StindtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Cohen v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.