Creighton v. Manson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant appealed from the judgment. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.
This action is brought to recover of the defendant the amount of the assessment levied upon a lot in San Francisco, by the Superintendent of Public Streets and Highways, to pay the plaintiff, as the contractor, for his services in grading Union street; also to enforce the assessment as a lien upon the lot.
The defendant was the owner of the lot when the services were performed, and still remains the owner. Previous to the making of the contract for the grading of the street between *619the Superintendent and the contractor, the lot was appraised, for revenue purposes, at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re WilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- People v. Mayor of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1849
- People ex rel. McKnight v. BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- In re the Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1830
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Hammett v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.