Western Coal Traffic League and Its Members v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentJohn R. Brown, Circuit Judge
I dissent as to the Court’s holding “that the Commission’s rule allowing evidence of product and geographic competition in deciding whether a carrier has market dominance violates the limits contained in the statutory definition and is invalid,” and to the reasons assigned to that result.1
The Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (“4R Act”) constitutes a dramatic shift in government control of our nation’s railroads, a shift “from reliance on government control to serve the public interest to reliance on market forces.” Morton, Contract Rates by Rail — A Tool in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Company & Other Railroads v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Central Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.