Legal Opinion
Bickel v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 10, 1965No. Record 5982PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFAnson, J.
This is an action on an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, indemnifying plaintiffs, James E. Bickel and wife, against loss or damage to their automobile by collision.
The case was tried to a jury, and after hearing Mr. Bickel’s testimony defendant moved the court to enter summary judgment for the plaintiffs for only the cost of repairs, storage and towing, pursuant to the terms of the insurance contract. Before sustaining defendant’s motion and entering summary judgment for the plaintiffs in the amount of $801.90, which limited plaintiffs’ damages to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Campbell v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
- Haussler v. Indemnity Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
- Roberdeau v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. TumlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Siegle v. Progressive Consumers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
- A & E Supply Company, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, a & E Supply Company, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Schulmeyer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.