Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Jaquan M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 2012Published

1Dissent

Friedman and Catterson, JJ., dissent in a memorandum by Catterson, J., as follows: I must respectfully dissent. In my view, the totality of the circumstances justified not only a De Bour level two common-law inquiry, but also provided the police with reasonable suspicion to believe that the appellant was illegally carrying a gun in his backpack justifying a level three stop and frisk.

Relying on People v Fernandez (87 AD3d 474 [1st Dept 2011]), the majority acknowledges that the appellant’s “furtive behavior at night and in a high-crime neighborhood” justified a level two inquiry. However,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. GomezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. MarineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API