In re Jaquan M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Friedman and Catterson, JJ., dissent in a memorandum by Catterson, J., as follows: I must respectfully dissent. In my view, the totality of the circumstances justified not only a De Bour level two common-law inquiry, but also provided the police with reasonable suspicion to believe that the appellant was illegally carrying a gun in his backpack justifying a level three stop and frisk.
Relying on People v Fernandez (87 AD3d 474 [1st Dept 2011]), the majority acknowledges that the appellant’s “furtive behavior at night and in a high-crime neighborhood” justified a level two inquiry. However,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GomezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MarineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.