BAUTISTA-PEREZ v. Holder
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on April 6, 2009 on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Having carefully considered the parties’ written and oral arguments, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth below.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
As this is the second motion to dismiss that this Court has considered, the following factual account is drawn from the Court’s order of February 4, 2008, 2008 WL 314486.
The Immigration Act of 1990 established a procedure whereby the government could provide temporary…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CopyTele, Inc. v. E Ink Holdings, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013