Legal Opinion
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Powell
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 2, 1923No. 2736PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the terms of the "safety appliance" statute applicable (article 6710, Vernon's Statutes), it was unlawful for appellant —
"to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line of railroad within the state of Texas, any locomotive, tender, car or similar vehicle employed in moving intrastate traffic within the said state which is not equipped with couplers, coupling automatically by impact, and which can be coupled and uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the ends of locomotives, tenders, cars and similar vehicles."
As we understand the testimony it was amply sufficient to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. VoelkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Lancaster v. FitchTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. DennisMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gulf, C. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. LockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. PyronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. BoundsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926