Legal Opinion

People v. Dallas

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1941No. Crim. 1747PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant was convicted on two separate counts of an information. The first one charged him, under section 480 of the Vehicle Code, with failing to stop his automobile, after it was involved in an accident, to render assistance to a pedestrian who was struck by his machine and instantly killed. The third count charged him with driving his machine on the left side of a roadway at a point less than 100 feet from an intersecting highway, contrary to section 530 (b) 2, of the same code, resulting in the death of the same individual. The defendant was acquitted of the offense of “negligent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. PettingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. ParishIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. People v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API