Legal Opinion

State v. Seraphine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Secs. 85.47 (1) (a) and (d), Stats., deal with overloads on Class “A” highways. It is the first con tention of the defendants upon this appeal that the state failed to prove that the highway upon which the defendants were traveling at the time of the alleged violations was a Class “A” highway. The statutes provide that state trunk highways and connecting streets shall be designated as Class “A” highways. The highways in this state designated as United States highways are actually a part of the state trunk highway system. Thus, the stipulations indicate that the three alleged violations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wisconsin Allied Truck Owners Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. StehlekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. Stang Tank LineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. Friedrich & Loots Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PrattWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. MoralesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. Trailer Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. Dried Milk Products Co-OperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API